ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
The Role of 4D Flow MRI-derived Wall Shear Stress in Aortic Disease: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Specific Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations Suggest Wall-Shear-Stress-Related Biomarkers in Type B Dissection Associated with Marfan Syndrome.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Patient-specific digital twins in aortic disease: integrating computational hemodynamics, immune profiling, and precision endovascular strategy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Aorta unveiled: the crucial role of imaging in diagnosing and managing aortic disease-a review.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic diseases, such as aortic dissection and aortic rupture, often lead to catastrophic complications, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality. Population-based screening for early detection in asymptomatic individuals is not feasible due to high costs and practical challenges. However, recent advancements in four dimensions (4D) Flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer a comprehensive tool for evaluating hemodynamic changes within the aortic lumen. This technology allows for the quantification and visualization of flow patterns and the calculation of advanced hemodynamic parameters, such as wall shear stress (WSS). WSS is crucial in the development, risk stratification, and surgical outcomes of aortic diseases and their complications, enabling noninvasive and quantitative screening of high-risk populations. This review explores the current status and limitations of 4D flow MRI-derived WSS imaging for aortic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.