ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
The Application of Checklist in Chronic Disease: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Current Situation and Future Trends of Ergothioneine in Biology and Medical Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Increasing evidence suggests that checklist plays an important role in chronic disease. This study aims to use bibliometric methods to explore the evolving global research trends, hotspots, and emerging frontiers of the application of checklist in chronic disease research, providing deeper insights into the current research landscape and guiding future chronic disease management development efforts. Methods: Bibliometrics analysis was performed utilizing RStudio and VOSviewer software. This atlas analyzed the global research trends, hotspots and emerging trends. Results: In total, there were 408 publications authored by 2398 authors from 784 institutions and 53 countries, published in 274 journals. The USA led in publication numbers, international cooperation and societal impact. The leading core journal was Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. The first highly cited document was published in Psychological Assessment by Bovin MJ et al. Chronic disease management, and the validity of treatment and recovery were the hotspots and potential trends. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the application of checklist in chronic disease research, uncovering global research trends and current hotspots while offering valuable insights and references for future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.