Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160454›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2025

Utilization of resting-state electroencephalography spectral power in convolutional neural networks for classification of primary progressive aphasia.

Christina Quinn, Alex Craik, Rachel Tessmer, Maya L Henry, Heather Dial

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina QuinnDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Houston, 3871 Holman St, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
Alex CraikDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, 4226 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3871-1839
Rachel TessmerGeriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8125-2802
Maya L HenryDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 2504a Whitis Ave a1100, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Heather DialDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Houston, 3871 Holman St, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3487-9183

Funding

Establishing Evidence-based Treatment for Speech and Language in Primary Progressive AphasiaR01DC016291 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HENRY, MAYA · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Rehabilitation of speech and language in primary progressive aphasiaR03DC013403 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HENRY, MAYA · 2014 to 2016
$565k
Investigating Neural Signatures of Rehabilitation in Primary Progressive AphasiaF32DC016812 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DIAL, HEATHER R · 2018 to 2020
$192k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC016812NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016291NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated relative power spectral density (PSD) in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) in delta, theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands in eyes open and closed resting-state electroencephalography (EEG). Our aims were to assess whether discernible differences could be observed between each PPA variant and to determine the utility of PSD for PPA classification when used as input to a convolutional neural network (CNN). Findings in the current study were similar to previous studies in logopenic PPA, with a significant increase in relative PSD in delta and theta bands and a significant reduction in the beta band (consistent with oscillatory slowing). We did not observe a significant increase in power for lower frequency bands or a reduction of power in higher frequency bands for semantic or nonfluent PPA, in contrast to what has been previously reported. In semantic PPA, evidence pointed to oscillatory speeding, not the slowing that was previously reported in a single-case study. In nonfluent PPA, spectral power fell between logopenic and semantic PPA, suggesting there is oscillatory slowing but to a lesser extent than logopenic PPA. The CNN was relatively successful in distinguishing PPA from healthy controls (F1 = 0.851). The CNN did not perform as well on four-way classification (lvPPA, svPPA, nfvPPA, controls; F1 = 0.586) but was significantly above chance. These results are promising and suggest that resting-state EEG may prove useful as a biomarker for PPA diagnosis. Potential factors underlying the differences between the findings of the current study and previous work are discussed.

Indexed as

ClassificationDeep learningPower spectral densityPrimary progressive aphasiaResting-state electroencephalography

Identifiers

PMID40160454
PMCPMC11951442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.