ArticleArXiv2025
Mechanoreceptive Aβ primary afferents discriminate naturalistic social touch inputs at a functionally relevant time scale.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of knowledge graphs in health management for chronic disease patients: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interpersonal touch is an important channel of social emotional interaction. How these physical skin-to-skin touch expressions are processed in the peripheral nervous system is not well understood. From microneurography recordings in humans, we evaluated the capacity of six subtypes of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents to differentiate human-delivered social touch expressions. Leveraging statistical and classification analyses, we found that single units of multiple mechanoreceptive Aβ subtypes, especially slowly adapting type II (SA-II) and fast adapting hair follicle afferents (HFA), can reliably differentiate social touch expressions at accuracies similar to human recognition. We then identified the most informative firing patterns of SA-II and HFA afferents, which indicate that average durations of 3-4 s of firing provide sufficient discriminative information. Those two subtypes also exhibit robust tolerance to spike-timing shifts of up to 10-20 ms, varying with touch expressions due to their specific firing properties. Greater shifts in spike-timing, however, can change a firing pattern's envelope to resemble that of another expression and drastically compromise an afferent's discrimination capacity. Altogether, the findings indicate that SA-II and HFA afferents differentiate the skin contact of social touch at time scales relevant for such interactions, which are 1-2 orders of magnitude longer than those for non-social touch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40160444PMC11952579What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.