ReviewiScience2025
From static to dynamic: Conceptual and operational developments of vulnerability.
Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Starting with the end of the last century, vulnerability has gained traction as a predictable and modellable component in the risk equation. Today, its diverse interpretations and assessment frameworks reflect both the vitality of research in this area and the potential for confusion. This paper aims to enhance the understanding of vulnerability by reflecting on existing research and addressing its different nuances, ultimately guiding future vulnerability research. We provide a critical view on the evolution of vulnerability, tracing its shift from a static measure of an element's capacity to be harmed by hazards, to a multifaceted, dynamic concept. We explore various vulnerability definitions, cross-disciplinary approaches, models that integrate vulnerability, global patterns, and assessment tools. The drivers behind the shift of vulnerability from a static to a dynamic concept, together with the conceptual and operational frameworks necessary to achieve this transition, are also extensively discussed. This effort brings together snapshots of an ongoing and intricate approach to vulnerability and underscores the need for continued research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.