Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160417›Full record

ReviewiScience2025

The pivotal role of open source knowledge transfer to achieve universal energy access.

Sanli Faez, Vivien Barnier, Dimitrios Mentis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanli FaezDebye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Princetonplein 1, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Vivien BarnierEnAccess Foundation, Industrieweg 9, Voorschoten, the Netherlands.
Dimitrios MentisWorld Resource Institute, 10 G Street NE, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20002, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-company collaboration based on open source technologies is emerging as an alternative to proprietary solutions for planning, implementation, and maintenance of localized access to clean renewable electricity. We highlight some recent breakthroughs in creation of local technology ecosystems that follow an open access approach to knowledge transfer. On the other hand, on top of engineering, manufacturing, and maintenance questions, community led projects need to address social acceptance, economic viability, and regulatory barriers. Despite these barriers, open source in energy access is expanding and new sustainable business models are practiced. By comparing the advances in open source hardware scholarship with that of free and open source software, we anticipate an increasing communal pressure for adopting open-source friendly innovation policies. Academia and in particular university knowledge transfer policies play an essential role in achieving universal energy access via open source technologies.

Indexed as

Energy policyEnergy sustainabilityEnergy systemsOpen source software

Identifiers

PMID40160417
PMCPMC11951008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.