Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160384›Full record

ReviewGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025

A scoping review to evaluate the efficacy of combining traditional healing and modern psychiatry in global mental healthcare.

Sagar Jilka, Catherine Winsper, Samantha A Johnson, Onaedo Ilozumba, Ryan G Wagner, Sanjana Subhedar, Dafne Morroni, Richard Lilford, Swaran P Singh

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sagar JilkaWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-9350
Catherine WinsperWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Samantha A JohnsonLibrary Services, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Onaedo IlozumbaInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4951-9631
Ryan G WagnerMRC/Wits Agincourt Research Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sanjana SubhedarWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Dafne MorroniWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0921-4941
Richard LilfordInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Swaran P SinghWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-2089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional faith healers (TFHs) are often consulted for serious mental illness (SMIs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Involvement of TFHs in mental healthcare could provide an opportunity for early identification and intervention to reduce the mental health treatment gap in LMICs. The aim of this study was to identify models of collaboration between TFHs and biomedical professionals, determine the outcomes of these collaborative models and identify any mechanisms (i.e., explanatory processes) or contextual moderators (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of these outcomes. A systematic scoping review of five electronic databases was performed from inception to March 2023 guided by consultation with local experts in Nigeria and Bangladesh. Data were extracted using a predefined data charting form and synthesised narratively. Six independent studies (eight articles) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Study locations included Ghana (n = 1), Nigeria (n = 1), Nigeria and Ghana (n = 1), India (n = 1), Hong Kong (n = 1) and South Africa (n = 1). We identified two main intervention typologies: (1) Western-based educational interventions for TFHs and (2) shared collaborative models between TFHs and biomedical professionals. Converging evidence from both typologies indicated that education for TFHs can help reduce harmful practices. Shared collaborative models led to significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms (in comparison to care as usual) and increases in referrals to biomedical care from TFHs. Proposed mechanisms underpinning outcomes included trust building and empowering TFHs by increasing awareness and knowledge of mental illness and human rights. Barriers to implementation were observed at the individual (e.g., suspicions of TFHs), relationship (e.g., reluctance of biomedical practitioners to equalise their status with TFHs) and service (e.g., lack of formal referral systems) levels. Research on collaborative models for mental healthcare is in its infancy. Preliminary findings are encouraging. To ensure effective collaboration, future programmes should incorporate active participation from community stakeholders (e.g., patients, caregivers, faith healers) and target barriers to implementation on multiple levels.

Indexed as

biomedical carecollaborative carelow- and middle-income countriesmental illnesstraditional faith healers

Identifiers

PMID40160384
PMCPMC11949735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.