ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection Utilizing a Multidisciplinary Team: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Managed by a Multidisciplinary Endocarditis Team: A Retrospective Cohort Study.CJC open · 2026Article
- Antibiotic treatment duration for isolated methicillin-susceptibleJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- Partial Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy for Endocarditis With Management by a Multidisciplinary Team: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Hepatitis C Treatment Outcomes for Patients With Infective Endocarditis Treated by an Interdisciplinary Team.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Significant numbers of cardiac implantable electronic devices are placed in the United States, and infection can be a severe consequence of implantation. Despite guideline recommendations and data demonstrating that lead extraction improves mortality for patients with device infection, rates of lead removal are lower than guideline recommendations. We report the outcomes associated with management of suspected cardiac implantable electronic device infections by a multidisciplinary team. Methods: Patient cases were identified from an institutional multidisciplinary endocarditis team registry in a single-center retrospective study. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were recorded by study investigators. Results: Between September 7, 2021, and February 1, 2024, 80 consecutive patients with suspected cardiac implantable electronic device infections were identified. Fifty-four (67.5%) patients, including 27/35 (77.1%) with definitive device infection/endocarditis and 30/30 (100%) with pocket infections, underwent device removal at a median of 3 days after admission to the authors' institution. In-hospital and 90-day mortality was numerically lower in patients who underwent device removal compared with those who did not (13% vs 19.2%; Conclusions: The use of a multidisciplinary team for management of suspected cardiac implantable electronic device infections was associated with high rates of expedient device extraction and relatively low rates of device reimplantation. One-year mortality was lower in patients who underwent device extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.