Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160346›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection Utilizing a Multidisciplinary Team: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Evan Hall, Bennett Collis, Talal Alnabelsi, Chloe Cao, Meredith Johnson, John Gurley, Luke Strnad, Hassan Reda, Tessa London, Erinn Ogburn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Evan HallUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Bennett CollisUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Talal AlnabelsiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
Chloe CaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, HCA Healthcare/USF Morsani College of Medicine GME/HCA Florida Trinity, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8256-9353
Meredith JohnsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
John GurleyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
Luke StrnadDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1583-9453
Hassan RedaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
Tessa LondonDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
Erinn OgburnDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
Michael SekelaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
Bobbi Jo StonerUniversity of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
Sami El-DalatiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2603-2951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Significant numbers of cardiac implantable electronic devices are placed in the United States, and infection can be a severe consequence of implantation. Despite guideline recommendations and data demonstrating that lead extraction improves mortality for patients with device infection, rates of lead removal are lower than guideline recommendations. We report the outcomes associated with management of suspected cardiac implantable electronic device infections by a multidisciplinary team. Methods: Patient cases were identified from an institutional multidisciplinary endocarditis team registry in a single-center retrospective study. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were recorded by study investigators. Results: Between September 7, 2021, and February 1, 2024, 80 consecutive patients with suspected cardiac implantable electronic device infections were identified. Fifty-four (67.5%) patients, including 27/35 (77.1%) with definitive device infection/endocarditis and 30/30 (100%) with pocket infections, underwent device removal at a median of 3 days after admission to the authors' institution. In-hospital and 90-day mortality was numerically lower in patients who underwent device removal compared with those who did not (13% vs 19.2%; Conclusions: The use of a multidisciplinary team for management of suspected cardiac implantable electronic device infections was associated with high rates of expedient device extraction and relatively low rates of device reimplantation. One-year mortality was lower in patients who underwent device extraction.

Indexed as

cardiac implantable electronic device extractioncardiac implantable electronic device infectionsendocarditis teamslead management teamsmultidisciplinary teams

Identifiers

PMID40160346
PMCPMC11949750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.