ArticleBrain & spine2025
Microsurgical resection of intracranial meningiomas in patients aged 80 years old or more: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Meningiomas in Elderly Patients: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors, and Personalized Treatment Strategies.Revista de neurologia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of intracranial meningiomas rises with advancing age, raising the question of whether similar surgical outcomes in morbidity and mortality can be expected compared to younger population. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of research examining microsurgical outcomes in those aged 80 years or older. Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we reviewed articles published between January 1995 and January 2024, referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical studies of series reporting microsurgical resection of intracranial meningiomas in patients aged 80 years or more, written in English. Primary outcome was EOR (extend of resection), classified as tumor total resection versus partial resection. Secondary outcomes were morbidity and mortality. Results: Ten studies reported 690 patients. Total tumor resection was achieved in 88% of cases (range 85-91; I Conclusion: Current data suggests that achieving high total resection rates, up to 88%, is feasible. The surgical mortality rate was 5%. A key unresolved neurosurgical dilemma is whether to operate on patients over 80 years old. Future studies are essential to assess all relevant risk factors comprehensively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.