Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160314›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2025

Microsurgical resection of intracranial meningiomas in patients aged 80 years old or more: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Simon Diaz, Marc Levivier, Nicolas Reyns, Constantin Tuleasca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simon DiazLausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marc LevivierLausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas ReynsNeurosurgery and Neurooncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille, Roger Salengro Hospital, Lille, France.
Constantin TuleascaLausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of intracranial meningiomas rises with advancing age, raising the question of whether similar surgical outcomes in morbidity and mortality can be expected compared to younger population. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of research examining microsurgical outcomes in those aged 80 years or older. Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we reviewed articles published between January 1995 and January 2024, referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical studies of series reporting microsurgical resection of intracranial meningiomas in patients aged 80 years or more, written in English. Primary outcome was EOR (extend of resection), classified as tumor total resection versus partial resection. Secondary outcomes were morbidity and mortality. Results: Ten studies reported 690 patients. Total tumor resection was achieved in 88% of cases (range 85-91; I Conclusion: Current data suggests that achieving high total resection rates, up to 88%, is feasible. The surgical mortality rate was 5%. A key unresolved neurosurgical dilemma is whether to operate on patients over 80 years old. Future studies are essential to assess all relevant risk factors comprehensively.

Indexed as

ElderlyIntracranial meningiomaMicrosurgical resectionMorbidityMortality

Identifiers

PMID40160314
PMCPMC11950967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.