ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2025
Diagnostic value of miR‑21 and miR‑221 as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Effect of radical prostatectomy on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Extracellular vesicle-derived miR21 of non-tumoral origin as early diagnostic marker of glioma.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Oxidative Stress-Driven Cellular Senescence: Mechanistic Crosstalk and Therapeutic Horizons.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- MicroRNA‑21: A potential therapeutic target in lung cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is globally the second most diagnosed malignancy in men, with >1.5 million new cases reported in 2020. Given the limitations of classical detection methods, the discovery of new predictive PCa biomarkers is critical. MicroRNAs (miRs), which are small, single-stranded, non-coding RNA molecules, have emerged as potential biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of miR-21 and miR-221 in PCa and their association with clinicopathological parameters. The expression of miR-21 and miR-221 was assessed using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR in 50 tumour and 50 control tissue samples. The results demonstrated that miR-21 and miR-221 were significantly upregulated in PCa tissues compared with that of the normal control tissues. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that miR-21 had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90, with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 96%. Similarly, miR-221 demonstrated an AUC of 0.89, with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 78%. High expression of miR-21 and miR-221 was also demonstrated to be associated with higher Gleason scores and advanced tumour stages. The findings of the present study indicate the potential role of miR-21 and miR-221 as biomarkers in the diagnosis of PCa. However, further studies in non-invasive samples such as serum, blood and urine are needed to support the results of the present study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.