Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160284›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Approach to Osteochondral Lesions of the Posteromedial Talar Dome: A Review of Arthroscopic Videos.

Jun Young Choi, Jae-Hoo Lee, Kyeong Woo Park, Jin Soo Suh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun Young ChoiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3864-9521
Jae-Hoo LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Kyeong Woo ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Jin Soo SuhDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-9149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) most commonly occur in the posteromedial talar dome; however, there are no consensus guidelines on the appropriate approach to performing microfracture; that is, whether adequate visualization can be achieved solely through anterior ankle arthroscopy as well as the circumstances under which posterior ankle arthroscopy is required. Purpose: To ascertain whether (1) arthroscopic microfracture of posteromedial OLT can be accomplished solely through anterior ankle arthroscopy and (2) if there are specific conditions that may require posterior ankle arthroscopy. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed videos of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic microfractures for OLT on the posteromedial talar dome between January 2010 and June 2021. The enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to the direction of arthroscopy (anterior or posterior). Then, we focused on whether visualization of the posteromedial OLT was adequate through the anteromedial or anterolateral portal in the anterior ankle arthroscopy group (posteromedial or posterolateral portal in the posterior ankle arthroscopy group). Similarly, we assessed whether a sufficient microfracture technique was feasible during surgery. Results: A total of 79 patients were included in this study, among which 62 and 17 were assigned to the anterior and posterior ankle arthroscopy groups, respectively. Posteromedial OLTs were fully observed through the anteromedial portal in 79.0% of cases and better observed through the anterolateral portal (93.5%). Among the patients who underwent anterior ankle arthroscopy, only 4 (6.5%) experienced limited visualization, leading to an insufficient microfracture procedure. In 2 of these 4 patients, we observed challenges in advancing the arthroscopy and other devices owing to the narrow joint space, even with sufficient distraction, whereas the remaining 2 showed infeasibilities derived from the location extending posteriorly beyond the tibial plafond on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. In contrast, microfracture of posteromedial OLT via posterior ankle arthroscopy was successfully performed in all patients. Conclusion: When surgically treating patients with posteromedial OLT, anterior ankle arthroscopy allowed for the successful performance of the microfracture procedure in most cases, unless there was a combined pathology necessitating surgical intervention on the posterior ankle. Posterior ankle arthroscopy can be selectively utilized only for far posteromedial OLT or in patients with narrow joint space, even with sufficient distraction.

Indexed as

anklearthroscopydirectionmicrofractureosteochondral lesionposteromedialtalus

Identifiers

PMID40160284
PMCPMC11954570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.