Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160241›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2025

A framework and analytical exploration for a data-driven update of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in sepsis.

Drago Plečko, Nicolas Bennett, Ida-Fong Ukor, Niklas Rodemund, Ary Serpa-Neto, Peter Bühlmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Drago PlečkoSeminar for Statistics, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
Nicolas BennettSeminar for Statistics, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
Ida-Fong UkorDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Niklas RodemundDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Austria.
Ary Serpa-NetoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter BühlmannSeminar for Statistics, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Sepsis-3 consensus statement emphasised the need for data-based approaches to organ failure assessment and use the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) for this purpose. We aimed to develop a framework for a data-driven update to the SOFA score for patients with sepsis. Design: Systematic analysis of potential markers of organ dysfunction in a retrospective, observational study. Setting: Intensive care units from three tertiary hospital centres in the United States, the Netherlands, and Austria were included in the study. Participants: 28 100 American, 5339 Dutch, and 2450 Austrian patients with suspected sepsis were included in this study. Measurements and main results: We assessed 56 organ function variables. We applied area under curve maximisation procedures to optimise the predictive power for mortality. We chose the most predictive biomarker for existing organ dysfunction domains and added a metabolic domain. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the precision recall curve of the data-driven approach against the current SOFA system. The novel approach outperformed the current SOFA in all domains and databases (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: for US patients: 0.766 vs. 0.727, mortality: 10.7%; for Dutch patients: 0.70 vs. 0.653, mortality: 22.0%; for Austrian patients: 0.704 vs. 0.665, mortality: 22.0%; all p < 0.01 for the best performing score). The precision-recall curve confirmed such observations. Conclusions: We developed and validated a framework for a data-driven update to the SOFA to identify and classify organ dysfunction in suspected septic patients. This framework can be used to revise the SOFA score and its application to the identification and classification of sepsis.

Indexed as

Big dataOrgan dysfunctionOrgan failureOutcome predictionSepsisSuspected infection

Identifiers

PMID40160241
PMCPMC11952785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.