ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Construction and validation of a machine learning-based nomogram model for predicting pneumonia risk in patients with catatonia: a retrospective observational study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Catatonia was often complicated by pneumonia, and the development of severe pneumonia after admission posed significant challenges to its treatment. This study aimed to develop a Nomogram Model based on pre-admission characteristics of patients with catatonia to predict the risk of pneumonia after admission. Methods: This retrospective observational study reviewed catatonia patients hospitalized at Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital from September 2019 to November 2024. Data included demographic characteristics, medical history, maintenance medications, and pre-admission clinical presentations. Patients were divided into catatonia with and without pneumonia groups. The LASSO Algorithm was used for feature selection, and seven machine learning models: Decision Tree(DT), Logistic Regression(LR), Naive Bayes(NB), Random Forest(RF), K Nearest Neighbors(KNN), Gradient Boosting Machine(GBM), Support Vector Machine(SVM) were trained. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value, F1 Score, Cohen's Kappa, and Brier Score, and Brier score. The best-performing model was selected for multivariable analysis to determine the variables included in the final Nomogram Model. The Nomogram Model was further validated through ROC Curves, Calibration Curves, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and Bootstrapping to ensure discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability. Results: Among 156 patients, 79 had no pneumonia, and 77 had pneumonia. LASSO Algorithm identified 15 non-zero coefficient variables (LASSO 1-SEλ=0.076). The GBM showed the best performance (AUC = 0.954, 95% CI: 0.924-0.983, Conclusion: This study developed a Nomogram Model based on five key factors, demonstrating significant clinical value in predicting the risk of pneumonia in hospitalized patients with catatonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.