Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160197›Full record

ArticleJournal of migration and health2025

Prevalence of psychological distress detected by the PROTECT and PHQ4 questionnaires and subsequent mental health diagnosis. A cross sectional analysis of the outcomes of new arrival health assessments for refugees and asylum seekers in Ireland.

Bridget Kiely, James Larkin, Kathryn Mullan, Maitiú Ó Tuathail, Emma Coughlan, Debbie Marshall, Margaret Fitzgerald, Fiona O'Reilly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of migration and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bridget KielyDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin 2, Ireland.
James LarkinDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Kathryn MullanDepartment of Psychiatry, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Maitiú Ó TuathailSafetynet Primarycare Catherine McCauley Centre, 21 Nelson Street, Dublin 7.
Emma CoughlanSafetynet Primarycare Catherine McCauley Centre, 21 Nelson Street, Dublin 7.
Debbie MarshallSafetynet Primarycare Catherine McCauley Centre, 21 Nelson Street, Dublin 7.
Margaret FitzgeraldHSE National Social Inclusion Office, Mill Lane, Palmerstown, Dublin 20, D20 KH63.
Fiona O'ReillySafetynet Primarycare Catherine McCauley Centre, 21 Nelson Street, Dublin 7.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The mental health needs of refugees and asylum seekers are often unmet. Many screening methods for mental health problems in refugees and asylum seekers have been suggested, but the optimal method for identifying those at risk has not been determined. The PROTECT questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ4) are two tools currently being used to identify refugees and asylum seekers at risk of mental health problems in Ireland, but there is limited data on the prevalence of positive scores or risk factors for these to inform health service planning. Methods: Cross sectional analysis was conducted of anonymous data of all adult asylum seekers or refugees who completed a PHQ4 and PROTECT questionnaire during their nurse conducted arrival health assessment within a one-year period. Data collected include: gender, age category, marital status, family unit, country of origin, refugee/asylum status, medical conditions, mental health conditions, exposure to violence, PROTECT score, PHQ4 score and outcome of GP mental health review. Statistical analysis was completed using R. Results: 440 people completed a PROTECT and PHQ4 questionnaire. 198 people had a GP review based on either a positive PROTECT or PHQ4 score. Among all participants, 9.1 % ( Conclusions: Rates of depression, anxiety and PTSD were similar to other studies. There was a strong correlation between PHQ4 scores and PROTECT but with PROTECT ultimately identifying more cases of depression and PTSD, suggesting it may be reasonable to use it alone. Whichever screening tool is used, adequate healthcare resources need to be available for further assessment and treatment. Participants from Syria were less likely to have a positive score compared to others and further research is required to understand the reasons for this.

Indexed as

International protectionMental healthPsychological distressPTSDTrauma

Identifiers

PMID40160197
PMCPMC11951198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.