Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160174›Full record

ReviewGut microbes2025

Effects of bacteriophages on gut microbiome functionality.

Elena Kurilovich, Naama Geva-Zatorsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Colibactin beyond carcinogenesis.Nature microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Remodelling of the gut virome after long-term fasting.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Phage Therapy in Gastrointestinal Diseases: Current Status and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Deciphering defensive mechanisms inFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elena KurilovichDepartment of Cell Biology and Cancer Science, Rappaport Technion Integrated Cancer Center (RTICC), Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-9922
Naama Geva-ZatorskyDepartment of Cell Biology and Cancer Science, Rappaport Technion Integrated Cancer Center (RTICC), Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7303-854X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome, composed of bacteria, fungi, and viruses, plays a crucial role in maintaining the delicate balance of human health. Emerging evidence suggests that microbiome disruptions can have far-reaching implications, ranging from the development of inflammatory diseases and cancer to metabolic disorders. Bacteriophages, or "phages", are viruses that specifically infect bacterial cells, and their interactions with the gut microbiome are receiving increased attention. Despite the recently revived interest in the gut phageome, it is still considered the "dark matter" of the gut, with more than 80% of viral genomes remaining uncharacterized. Today, research is focused on understanding the mechanisms by which phages influence the gut microbiota and their potential applications. Bacteriophages may regulate the relative abundance of bacterial communities, affect bacterial functions in various ways, and modulate mammalian host immunity. This review explores how phages can regulate bacterial functionality, particularly in gut commensals and pathogens, emphasizing their role in gut health and disease.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriophagesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsGastrointestinal TractHumansbacterial functionalitybacteriophagesGut microbiomegut phageome

Identifiers

PMID40160174
PMCPMC11959909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.