Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160105›Full record

ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025

What is the current state of the research literature examining the impact of the motor neurone disease journey on the couple's relationship? A scoping review.

Ella Malloy, Sarah Corrie, Noreen Cushen-Brewster

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ella MalloyInstitute of Health and wellbeing, University of Suffolk, Health and Wellbeing Building, Ipswich, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-7115
Sarah CorrieSchool of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Suffolk, Neptune Quay, Ipswich, UK.
Noreen Cushen-BrewsterSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Suffolk, Health and Wellbeing Building, Ipswich, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotor neurone disease (MND) results in complex and disabling symptoms that give rise to significant and challenging care needs. While much of the care required is typically provided by the partner of the individual who has been diagnosed with MND, there are few studies that have investigated the impact of MND on the couple's relationship.

objectivesTo establish the current state of the research literature examining the impact of MND on the couple's relationship.

methodsA scoping review was undertaken with thematic analysis used to synthesize the data.

resultsThe scoping review identified 15 studies that were thematically analyzed to identify prominent themes. The following 5 themes were identified: adjusting to new roles; changes in communication and values; spouse well-being and health; and changes to social relationships and intimacy changes. SIGNIFICANCE OF

resultsThis scoping review highlighted the impact of the MND trajectory on the couple's relationship overall and on key areas of couple communication and functioning. These areas can be used to guide the development of interventions and services that are tailored to the needs of couple relationships. Further understanding of the factors impacting the couple's relationship on the MND journey and how to navigate these factors is critically warranted.

Indexed as

Motor Neuron DiseaseSpousesAdaptation, PsychologicalFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleQualitative Researchcaregiverscommunication changescouple relationshipsMNDspousal wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40160105
PMCPMC13166447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.