ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Secrets and Their Consequences in Heathcare: A Scoping Review of Worker Experiences.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo explore current knowledge of the nature of secrets healthcare consumers reveal to healthcare workers and the impact on the healthcare worker experience resulting from these private disclosures.
designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: Eight electronic databases were searched for studies published between 1980 and 2025 that met the inclusion criteria. REVIEW
methodsArksey and O'Malley's five-step methodological framework for scoping reviews guided this review. Petronio's Communication Privacy Management theory also informed the inclusion criteria.
resultsA total of 11,812 records were identified, and 76 studies were included. Four types of secrets emerged: (1) Medical concerns, (2) Sexuality, (3) Abuse and (4) Life choices and decisions. Healthcare workers viewed the disclosure experience either as a privilege or a burden. Healthcare workers constructed strategies to avoid or facilitate disclosure and sought out trusted confidants for personal support throughout the experience. The review highlights the vulnerability of both the healthcare consumer and the healthcare worker, and the potential for negative health outcomes following a private disclosure.
conclusionHealthcare consumers make private disclosures to healthcare workers. Further research is needed to construct evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support healthcare workers in facilitating and managing private disclosures. IMPACT: Healthcare consumers may disclose secrets of sexuality, medical concerns, abuse, and life decisions and choices to healthcare workers. Limited studies report on the impact of these difficult conversations. The findings of this review can inform healthcare practice and further research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.