ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
A correction for modeling radial, spiral, and PROPELLER dynamic contrast-enhanced data: Time-averaged extended Tofts.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A correction for modeling radial, spiral, and PROPELLER dynamic contrast-enhanced data: Time-averaged extended Tofts.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (e.g. spiral, radial, PROPELLER MRI) often rely on oversampling the center of k-space. Instead of the discrete snapshots obtained by Cartesian sampling, oversampling the k-space center results in time-averaging of the signal. We hypothesize that these time-averaged signals decrease the accuracy of pharmacokinetic modeling and propose a model that accounts for this effect. THEORY AND
methodsTo test our hypothesis, a modified extended Tofts model tailored to accommodate time-averaged signals is proposed. Simulated Monte Carlo experiments were conducted to compare the performance of the modified model with the conventional model. Additionally, to validate the findings in vivo, models were fitted to pseudo-spiral variable-density dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI scans of pancreatic cancer patients reconstructed at 4, 8, 10, and 15 s/frame.
resultsThe simulations demonstrated that for time-averaged acquisitions, our modified extended Tofts model provided more accurate and precise results than conventional models. Additionally, by integrating signals, some information on high temporal behavior was recovered. Particularly, at long acquisitions (15 s/frame), variable-density sampling with the modified model outperformed conventional discrete sampling. In vivo experiments confirmed these findings, as the corrected model showed more consistent estimates of parameters
conclusionOur study demonstrates that time-averaged signals lead to decreased accuracy and precision in pharmacokinetic modeling when ignored. We suggest using our corrected pharmacokinetic model when performing dynamic contrast-enhanced with variable-density acquisitions, especially for dynamic scan times that are 8 s and longer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.