ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Middle-Out Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Support Pediatric Dosing Recommendation for Alectinib.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are treated with 600 mg alectinib twice daily (BID) as first-line treatment. ALK positive solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumors are described in the pediatric population, with limited clinical data due to the rarity of the disease and challenges to determine the right dosing. This study aims to inform pediatric dose recommendations for alectinib by performing a middle-out physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach, accounting for differences in absorption and enzyme maturation. The developed adult PBPK model is leveraging insights from two previously developed PBPK models (focusing on absorption and drug-drug interactions) and is complemented with newly generated data. The adult PBPK model is validated with pharmacokinetic data from two clinical studies in the adult population. The ratios between the predicted and observed steady-state AUC after 600 mg BID for 28 days are within the acceptable range in three different adult body weight categories (from 0.81 to 1.02). Initial pediatric dose recommendations are informed by population PK model predictions (assuming no maturation of enzymes) and aim to have similar exposure to the adult population. Intrinsic clearance values for all contributing CYP enzymes are included in the pediatric PBPK model to account for changes in enzyme maturation. The current PBPK model confirmed that the recommended alectinib doses by population PK predictions were accurate for the pediatric age range, with one exception: patients younger than 3.5 years are suggested to receive 100 mg BID, instead of 190 mg BID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.