ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Prognostic implications of alternative splicing events and key splicing factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incidence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains high, accompanied by low 5-year survival rates. Identifying prognostic factors is essential for advancing personalized treatment approaches. Increasing evidence implicates aberrant alternative splicing (AS) plays a key role in tumor progression. Utilizing data from TCGA and TCGA SpliceSeq, prognosis-associated AS events were identified through Cox regression analysis. A prognostic risk model was developed via multivariate Cox and LASSO regression, with validation conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and ROC curve analysis. The correlation between splicing factors (SFs) and prognosis-associated AS events was analyzed using Pearson's method, followed by the construction of an SF-AS regulatory network. Key splicing factors (KSFs) were identified using Cytoscape software. Expression of KSFs in HNSCC was confirmed by quantitative PCR and Western blotting. SiRNA-mediated knockdown in HNSCC cell lines (HONE1, HN4, SAS) demonstrated effects on cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, as assessed by CCK8, colony formation, Transwell, and wound healing assays. Tumor growth was further evaluated in a subcutaneous tumor model in vivo. A total of 2347 survival-related AS events were identified, of which eleven were used to construct the prognostic model. Patients in the low-risk group exhibited significantly improved outcomes (P = 0e + 00), underscoring the model's predictive accuracy. Notably, DDX39B and PRPF39 emerged as key splicing factors, exhibiting high expression in HNSCC and correlating with poor prognosis, positioning them as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.