ArticleFamilial cancer2025
The patterns and spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Iranian breast and ovarian cancer patients.
Article in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Significance of Tumor Invasion Gene Profiling in Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women with inherited BRCA1/2 mutations are at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. The reports on the prevalence and spectrum of these mutations have been primarily focused on individuals with European ancestry. A previous study on Iranian breast cancer patients reported no BRCA1/2 mutation in early-onset breast cancer with no other criteria, which is contrary to other populations. The purpose of this study was to characterize the patterns of these mutations in Iranian breast and ovarian cancer patients and evaluate the predictive efficacy of the Manchester scoring system in patients and their unaffected family members. We retrospectively reviewed the genetic testing performed for breast and ovarian cancer patients and unaffected individuals with a positive family history. The study participants were selected based on the NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) criteria (version 2.2024). A total of 376 female breast cancer patients, 49 ovarian cancer patients, and 74 unaffected individuals were enrolled in this study. In breast cancer patients, 24 (6.4%) BRCA1 and 23 (6.1%) BRCA2 mutations were detected. In ovarian cancer patients, 9 (18.5%) BRCA1 and 1 (2%) BRCA2 mutations were identified. Three (4.1%) BRCA2 mutations were identified in unaffected individuals. Seven breast cancer patients with age of cancer diagnosis ≤ 40 and no other criteria (including family history) had an underlying mutation: Four BRCA2, and three BRCA1 mutations. The Manchester score performed well, with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 70%. More research is needed to clarify the hereditary component of breast and ovarian cancer in Iranian patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40159529What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.