ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
Economic burden of disease and mortality of intracranial haemorrhage under oral FXai: a German claims data analysis.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital Health-Enabled Monitoring Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Detection after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implantable Loop Recorders, Wearable Devices, and Usual Care.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most serious complications of anticoagulant therapy with oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXai). To meet an urgent medical need of optimising treatment pathways, we assessed the frequency of ICH during oral FXai treatment, as well as the associated burden on the German healthcare system.
methodsOur study was based on a claims database comprising over 4 million people with statutory health insurance in Germany. The study included people initiating oral FXai treatment for the first time between 2016 and 2021, and who experienced ICH during a three-year treatment period. For a balanced comparison of hospitalisations, costs, and mortality, propensity score matching between patients with and without ICH was performed.
resultsDuring the study period, 78,086 patients had started oral FXai therapy, of which 530 experienced ICH during the therapy. The incidence rate of ICH was highest within the first 90 days after the start of oral FXai therapy during follow-up with 0.64 events per 100 patient-years (PY; 95% CI: 0.52-0.77%). Three-month mortality rates were significantly higher among patients who had experienced an ICH event (39.4%; 95% CI: 35.4-43.8%), as opposed to patients without ICH (5.9%; 95% CI: 4.2-8.3%). This difference prevailed during follow-up, while mortality increased at roughly equal rates in both patient groups. Patients with ICH were on average hospitalised for 40.4 days/PY (95% CI: 35.7 days - 45.2 days) in the first year after the event; comparable patients without ICH were hospitalised for 10.8 days/PY (95% CI: 8.3 days - 13.2 days). Annual total costs per patient were €37,328 (95% CI: €32,243-€42,412) for patients with ICH, and €10,564 (95% CI: €9,298-€11,831) for patients without ICH. Hospitalisation costs were the main driver with 86.1% versus 50.8%, respectively.
conclusionsIncidence rates of ICH during oral FXai therapy were within the range of other published real-world data. Duration of hospitalisations, associated costs, and mortality were high and significantly higher for patients with ICH than for comparable patients without ICH. The high burden on the healthcare system highlights the need for preventive measures and more efficient treatment pathways for patients with ICH under oral FXai therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.