ArticleBMC medical education2025
The missing element in urology training: operative dictation skills.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimOperative dictation (OD) is a critical component of surgical documentation, yet its formal teaching is often overlooked in residency training. This study aimed to evaluate the inclusion of OD training in urology residency programs and assess awareness and practices among urology residents (URs) and staff urologists (SUs). MATERIALS AND
methodsA structured questionnaire was developed to explore OD practices, awareness, and training methods. The questionnaire consisted of four sections: demographic characteristics, OD practices, awareness of OD as a skill, and formal OD training. It was distributed via e-mail to URs and SUs whose contact information was obtained from the Turkish Urological Association's Central Anatolia Branch. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.
resultsThe survey was sent to 252 participants and achieved a response rate of 86.9% (n = 219). Among the respondents, 61 were URs (27.8%) and 158 were SUs (72.1%). Most participants (96.7% of URs and 98.2% of SUs) reported no formal OD training during residency, informal methods, such as reviewing old ODs and guidance from senior residents, were commonly cited as learning approaches. Despite recognizing the importance of structured OD templates, participants highlighted the absence of standardized training curricula. Similar responses from experienced and novice surgeons suggest that this gap has persisted for decades.
conclusionThis study highlights the lack of formal OD training in urology residency programs and the reliance on informal methods. Integrating standardized OD training modules into residency curricula is essential to improve documentation quality and medico-legal reliability. Future research should explore the effectiveness of educational interventions and develop universal guidelines for OD practices. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.