ArticleBMC medical education2025
The surgical clinical training measurement: developing and evaluating the quality of surgical clinical training among Syrian surgical residents.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluation tools for training programs vary, necessitating a standardized tool for assessing surgical clinical training quality to enhance program effectiveness, pinpoint improvement areas, and ensure resident readiness for independent practice. We present a new tool designed to provide a reliable and consistent framework for evaluating the effectiveness of surgical clinical training.
methodsThe Surgical Clinical Training Measurement (SCTM) was developed using the modified Delphi method to evaluate ten variables, including core competencies specific to surgical training. It employs a 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 40 to 200. General surgery residents completed the SCTM twice to evaluate training levels. Results were categorized based on score ranges. Statistical analysis via SPSS included descriptive statistics, group comparisons, internal consistency assessments, correlations, and reliability tests to evaluate the SCTM scores, demographic characteristics, and language versions. ANOVA, Chi-Square, Cohen Kappa, and Spearman's rho tests were employed for data analysis.
results74 general surgery residents at Aleppo University Hospital have participated in this study. The SCTM scores indicated a mean total score of 131.42, with most residents falling into the good satisfactory category. Analysis showed no significant differences in total scores across specialty years, but post-hoc tests revealed differences between specific years. The SCTM demonstrated strong reliability, with a Kappa value of 0.884 indicating high agreement between English and Arabic versions (p < 0.05). Test-retest reliability was also high (r = 0.964, p < 0.01). Internal consistency was excellent across various domains, reinforcing its validity in surgical education. The analysis of variables showed different levels of reliability and mean scores among the various factors. The Pre-Operative Clinical variable had the highest performance, while the Evidence-Based Quality Clinical Training variable indicated the most potential for improvement. The strong positive correlations between various domains of SCTM emphasize the interconnected nature of skill development, with proficiency in patient care closely linked to competency in other areas such as Medical Knowledge, Practice-based Learning and Improvement, and Evidence-Based Quality Clinical Training.
conclusionSCTM offers a standardized and cohesive method for evaluating the quality of surgical clinical training. It's a valuable resource for program directors, educators, and residents to assess and enhance training programs, and identify specific areas for improvement. Additional research is required to validate the SCTM in different settings and explore its applicability in other fields. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.