ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Vernonia amygdalina displays otoprotective effects via antioxidant pathway on cisplatin-induced hair cell loss in zebrafish.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iatrogenic hearing loss is defined as irreversible cochlear hair cell injury resulting from medical intervention, such as cisplatin, which leads to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Vernonia amygdalina (VA), a medicinal herb, has recently been found to exerted pharmacotherapeutic potential due to its antioxidant activity. In the present study, we used a transgenic zebrafish line (pvalb3b: TagGFP) as an in vivo screening platform for discovering compounds or agents with potential otoprotective ability and a combination of behavioral methods for assessing the physiological outcome. The 1 h of 250 μM cisplatin treatment induced severs injury to lateral-line hair cell that triggered a drastic cell death response. Five readouts were conducted as the parameters of VA ultrasonic water extract (VAUWE) protection against cisplatin ototoxicity: (1) radical-scavenging ability, (2) hair cell viability, (3) mechanotransduction (MET) channel functionality, (4) apoptosis, (5) antioxidant defense, and (6) locomotor behavior. Our results demonstrated that 1-h pretreatment of VAUWE with non-toxic concentrations (1.0 mg/ml and 2.0 mg/ml) increases hair cell viability by blocking cisplatin entry through the MET channel and subsequently ameliorates apoptotic cell death. Regarding molecular mechanisms, VAUWE also modulates the expression of antioxidant enzyme gene, which collectively contributes to restoring impaired swimming behavior induced by cisplatin ototoxicity. The findings of the present study might highlight the in vivo protective role of VAUWE on modulating cisplatin-induced hair cell damage in transgenic zebrafish, which further informs preclinical foundations for developing potential otoprotectants against iatrogenic hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40159305What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.