ReviewExperimental physiology2025
Muscle wasting in cancer cachexia: Mechanisms and the role of exercise.
Review in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of mitochondrial dysfunction in muscle wasting in cancer cachexia: a narrative review.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- New perspectives on the physiological basis of muscle loss.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Aerobic exercise training attenuates the deleterious effects of walker-256 cancer: effects on physical capacity, cachexia, and cardiac mass.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio is associated with low muscle mass risk in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from a hospital-based cohort and NHANES validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Muscle wasting in cancer cachexia: Mechanisms and the role of exercise.Experimental physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer cachexia (CC) is a multifactorial disease marked by a severe and progressive loss of lean muscle mass and characterized further by inflammation and a negative energy/protein balance, ultimately leading to muscle atrophy and loss of muscle tissue. As a result, patients experiencing cachexia have reduced muscle function and thus less independence and a lower quality of life. CC progresses through stages of increasing severity: pre-cachexia, cachexia and refractory cachexia. Two proposed underlying mechanisms that drive cancer-induced muscle wasting are the autophagy-lysosome and ubiquitin-proteasome systems. An increase in autophagic flux and proteolytic activity leads to atrophy of both cardiac and skeletal muscle, ultimately mediated by tumour or immune-secreted inflammatory cytokines. These pathways occur at a basal level to maintain cellular homeostasis; therefore, it is the overactivation of the pathways that leads to muscle atrophy. Recent evidence demonstrates the ability of aerobic and resistance training to restore these pathways to their basal levels. The mechanism is not yet understood, and more research is needed to determine exactly how exercise influences each pathway. However, exercise has great promise as a therapeutic strategy for CC because of the evidence for it preserving muscle mass and function, and attenuating protein degradative pathways. The extent to which exercise affects the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome systems is determined by the frequency, intensity and duration of the exercise protocol. As such, an ideal exercise prescription is lacking for individuals with CC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.