Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40158885›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2025

A Comprehensive Guide to Achieving New York State Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program Approval for Next-Generation Sequencing Assays.

Phillip M Galbo, Robert F Klees, Blake Burgher, Kiersten M Miles, Carl M Morrison, Sean T Glenn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Phillip M GalboDepartment of Pathology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Robert F KleesWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
Blake BurgherDepartment of Pathology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Kiersten M MilesDepartment of Pathology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Carl M MorrisonDepartment of Pathology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Sean T GlennDepartment of Pathology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York. Electronic address: Sean.Glenn@RoswellPark.org.

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Dean G. Tang · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration's recent move to regulate laboratory-developed tests as in vitro diagnostics has raised significant interest and concerns regarding its implementation. The New York State Department of Health's Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program (CLEP) provides a useful framework for understanding laboratory-developed test oversight, particularly through its guidelines for next-generation sequencing assays. These CLEP requirements for analytical validation are widely recognized as a national standard, yet there is limited peer-reviewed literature detailing the studies needed for CLEP approval. This study presents the validation of the Rapid Pan-Heme (RPPH) assay, a genomic profiling tool for hematopoietic neoplasms, developed in compliance with CLEP standards. The RPPH assay features a comprehensive next-generation sequencing panel targeting >400 genes with clinically relevant variants, including single-nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, and fusions critical for classifying hematopoietic malignancies. CLEP approval mandates detailed documentation, quality control metrics, validation studies (accuracy, precision, and reproducibility), and compliant clinical reporting. It is demonstrated that RPPH achieves CLEP's stringent analytical sensitivity and reproducibility criteria. Variants were orthogonally validated, and proper controls were implemented. Additionally, it is outlined how RPPH's clinical reports align with CLEP requirements. Overall, this study establishes RPPH as a robust molecular diagnostic tool and provides actionable insights for researchers navigating regulatory compliance and assay validation in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLaboratories, ClinicalHumansNew YorkQuality ControlReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40158885
PMCPMC12163385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.