ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2025
A Comprehensive Guide to Achieving New York State Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program Approval for Next-Generation Sequencing Assays.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Inflammasome-associated pyroptosis and tumor angiogenesis in prostate cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Analytical Validation and Clinical Sensitivity of the Belay Summit Assay for the Detection of DNA Variants in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Primary and Metastatic Central Nervous System Cancer.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The US Food and Drug Administration's recent move to regulate laboratory-developed tests as in vitro diagnostics has raised significant interest and concerns regarding its implementation. The New York State Department of Health's Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program (CLEP) provides a useful framework for understanding laboratory-developed test oversight, particularly through its guidelines for next-generation sequencing assays. These CLEP requirements for analytical validation are widely recognized as a national standard, yet there is limited peer-reviewed literature detailing the studies needed for CLEP approval. This study presents the validation of the Rapid Pan-Heme (RPPH) assay, a genomic profiling tool for hematopoietic neoplasms, developed in compliance with CLEP standards. The RPPH assay features a comprehensive next-generation sequencing panel targeting >400 genes with clinically relevant variants, including single-nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, and fusions critical for classifying hematopoietic malignancies. CLEP approval mandates detailed documentation, quality control metrics, validation studies (accuracy, precision, and reproducibility), and compliant clinical reporting. It is demonstrated that RPPH achieves CLEP's stringent analytical sensitivity and reproducibility criteria. Variants were orthogonally validated, and proper controls were implemented. Additionally, it is outlined how RPPH's clinical reports align with CLEP requirements. Overall, this study establishes RPPH as a robust molecular diagnostic tool and provides actionable insights for researchers navigating regulatory compliance and assay validation in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.