ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Acute peritonitis caused by a giant appendicolith: A rare case report and a literature review.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGiant appendicoliths, which are calcified deposits larger than 2 cm found in the appendix, are uncommon and often linked to appendicitis, as well as complications like perforation or abscess formation. The occurrence of a giant appendicolith leading to peritonitis without accompanying appendicitis is rare, presenting a distinct diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 77-year-old male with beta-thalassemia minor came in with acute pain in the right lower quadrant, along with nausea and vomiting. Upon examination, he showed signs of peritoneal irritation, including rebound tenderness and guarding. Laboratory tests indicated mild leukopenia and normal inflammatory markers. Imaging studies identified a 5 cm appendicolith and localized free fluid suggestive of perforation, along with signs of superimposed peritonitis. Surgical intervention revealed a distended appendix containing the giant appendicolith and an ileocecal perforation, but histopathological analysis showed no evidence of acute appendicitis. The patient underwent an appendectomy and repair of the perforation, resulting in an uneventful recovery. DISCUSSION: Giant appendicoliths can lead to significant mechanical irritation and complications such as perforation, even in the absence of the typical inflammatory response associated with appendicitis. The diagnostic difficulty arises from the lack of fever and elevated inflammatory markers, which are usually present in cases of acute appendicitis.
conclusionGiant appendicoliths should be included in the differential diagnosis for acute abdominal pain, even when appendicitis is not evident. This case highlights the necessity of thorough approaches for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.