ArticleAIDS research and therapy2025
Standard of care in advanced HIV disease: review of HIV treatment guidelines in sub-Saharan African countries-an extension study of eight countries.
Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the intersection of HIV and Alzheimer's disease: a bibliometric analysis of emerging research trends.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe World Health Organization (WHO) has published guidelines for the management of patients with advanced HIV disease (AHD) but mortality remains high. Adoption of WHO recommendations by national guidelines is poorly documented. We aimed to extend our prior review of six national management guidelines by including additional countries from sub-Saharan Africa.
methodsWe identified guidelines of eight additional countries participating in a multicountry trial of azithromycin prophylaxis for AHD. Data was extracted in five domains including definition of AHD (1 item), screening (6 items), prophylaxis (6 items), supportive care (1 items), and HIV treatment (4 items) and scored agreement of each national guideline with the WHO guidelines.
resultsSix of the eight national guidelines had a designated section for AHD. Compared with the WHO guideline, the agreement score for national guidelines was between 7 and 17 out of 18, whereby disagreement is mainly driven by missing information. None of the national guidelines had more than three items not in agreement with the WHO guidelines, and the maximum number of items not addressed by any one guideline was eight. Main areas of disagreement were the targeted population for start of ART in presence of tuberculosis meningitis (1/8 in agreement) and urine lipoarabinomannan screening (2/8 in agreement). The targeted population group for cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and its discontinuation was in line with the WHO recommendations in 3/8 national guidelines. Except one guideline, all documents showed similar overall agreement, irrespectively of publication date.
conclusionNational guidelines for the management of people with AHD are broadly in agreement with WHO guidelines. Main areas of disagreement are recommendations regarding urine lipoarabinomannan screening, cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and start of antiretroviral therapy in presence of tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.