ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Accurate prediction of mediolateral episiotomy risk during labor: development and verification of an artificial intelligence model.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Tacit Knowledge Integration in Midwifery: Policy Implications for Improving Healthcare Outcomes.International nursing review · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe study developed an intelligent online evaluation system for mediolateral episiotomy, which incorporated machine learning algorithms and integrated maternal physiological data collected during delivery.
methodsIn this study, a predictive model for mediolateral episiotomy was constructed first, and based on this, an early warning system using open-source R software was established. The physiological data of 1191 parturients who delivered at Deyang People's Hospital in western China from January 2022 to December 2022 were collected and divided into training set and test set according to a ratio of 8:2. The factors affecting mediolateral episiotomy were determined based on the expert consultation method. Six machine learning models, namely Logistic regression(LR), Support Vector Machine(SVM), K-Nearest Neighb(KNN), Random Forest (RF), Light Gradient Boosting Machine(LightGBM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting(XGBoost) were constructed on this basis. The models' performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) measures. Additionally, a confusion matrix was employed to assess their performance across different categories. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) provided interpretability. The clinical external verification process focused on data collected from January to March 2023, and an intelligent online evaluation system for mediolateral episiotomy was developed.
resultsTwenty eight factors influencing mediolateral episiotomy were screened. The model evaluation results showed that the SVM model has the best prediction ability among the six models, with an accuracy of 0.793, a recall rate of 0.981, a precision rate of 0.790, and a F1 value of 0.875. The area under ROC curve of SVM was 0.882, The verification results showed that the prediction accuracy was 74% for undergoing mediolateral episiotomy and 93% for not undergoing it. SHAP analysis identified perineal elasticity, number of pregnancies, BMI, perineum edema, and age as top predictors. An early warning system for mediolateral episiotomy was successfully constructed, which can assist the clinical medical staff in decision-making by inputting the maternal data.
conclusionThe early warning system for the risk of mediolateral episiotomy constructed in this study can accurately and rapidly utilize the physiological data of parturients during labor to predict the risk of mediolateral episiotomy in the third stage of labor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.