ArticleBMC public health2025
Spatio-temporal variation of child stunting and associated risk factors in Rwanda.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences : A Cross-Sectional Study among Inpatients at Ndera Neuropsychiatric Teaching Hospital in Rwanda.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2026Article
- Exploring the Association Between Household Toilet Facility Type and Chronic Malnutrition in Children Under 5 years in Ghana's Northern Zone.Environmental health insights · 2026Article
- Community-driven strategies for preventing childhood stunting: perspectives from parents and front-line workers in Rwanda.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Bayesian spatio-temporal conditional autoregressive localized modeling techniques for socioeconomic factors and stunting in Indonesia.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Investigation of the underlying causes of malnutrition among children in the Nyabihu and Ngororero districts of Rwanda: a cross-sectional descriptive survey design.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe under-five child stunting has remained a public health problem in the world. In Rwanda, child stunting rates have fluctuated significantly and remained higher than the targets despite a continuing decline of the national average rate. The key drivers of the persistently high child stunting rates and their geographical variation in Rwanda are currently not well known. This study examined the spatial and temporal variation of the under-five child stunting rates and associated factors in Rwanda between 2010 and 2020.
methodsThis study analysed data from the 2010 Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS) (n = 4075), the 2014/15 RDHS (n = 3538), and the 2019/20 RDHS (n = 3809). A series of geo-additive binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify the key risk factors for child stunting and their variation in Rwanda between 2010 and 2020.
resultsThe results show significant variation in the key risk factors over the studied period. The child's gender, birth order, age, and birth weight, mother's height and marital status, number of antenatal care visits, household economic status, and altitude were consistently significant factors of child stunting in Rwanda. The influence of place of residence, mother's education, water source, and type of toilet facility varied. The district-level spatial effects significantly attenuated in the Eastern province while they intensified in the Western and Northern provinces.
conclusionsThe key risk factors for the under-five child stunting and their importance varied considerably over time in Rwanda. The findings suggest the need to improve the household-level welfare by strengthening targeted and district-tailored intervention programs from a multi-sectorial perspective, and sustain the programs outcomes beyond the intervention period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.