ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Clinical outcomes of double-flap technique versus gastric tube reconstruction following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious anti-reflux procedures are currently utilized for digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy (PG), but the optimal reconstruction method remains debated. This study aims to compare and analyze the clinical outcomes and postoperative quality of life between double-flap technique (DFT) and gastric tube (GT) reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG), providing a reference for selecting the appropriate digestive tract reconstruction method.
methodsThis multicenter, retrospective cohort study employed propensity score matching (PSM) to address baseline imbalances. Clinical, pathological, and follow-up data were collected from 124 patients who underwent either LPG-GT or LPG-DFT between January 2016 and May 2023 at four medical centers in China. The surgical outcomes, incidence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic stricture, postoperative nutritional status, and quality of life were compared between the two groups.
resultsAfter 1:1 PSM, 41 patients were included in each group for analysis. Compared to the LPG-GT group, the LPG-DFT group had a longer operation time (340.0 min vs. 280.0 min, P < 0.001) but less intraoperative blood loss (80.0 ml vs. 100.0 ml, P < 0.001), a shorter time to nasogastric tube removal (3.0 days vs. 5.0 days, P < 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (9.0 days vs. 12.0 days, P < 0.001). The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in the LPG-DFT and LPG-GT groups was 7.3% and 24.3% (P = 0.034), respectively, and the incidence of anastomotic stricture requiring dilation was 14.6% and 7.3% (P = 0.480). One year postoperatively, BMI (22.0 kg/m² vs. 20.6 kg/m², P = 0.010) and albumin levels at six months postoperatively (41.6 g/L vs. 39.1 g/L, P = 0.033) were significantly higher in the LPG-DFT group. However, albumin levels one year postoperatively showed no significant difference between the two groups (42.3 g/L vs. 40.7 g/L, P = 0.226).
conclusionThe surgical outcomes suggest that both LPG-GT and LPG-DFT are safe and feasible methods. However, LPG-DFT provides better anti-reflux effects and may help reduce the risk of postoperative malnutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.