ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Axial spondyloarthritis and breastfeeding: a prospective study.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spondyloarthritis in the peripartum period: a systematic review of current knowledge and clinical implications.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is sparse literature on the topic of breastfeeding in women with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Our aim was to obtain more knowledge about variables affecting breastfeeding for women with axSpA.
methodsThis prospective study used data from the nationwide quality register RevNatus, which collects pregnancy-related data in women with inflammatory rheumatic diseases from Norwegian outpatient clinics in rheumatology. Data were collected during January 2016 to August 2023, reporting on 436 pregnancies in 363 patients with axSpA. The study eventually included 417 births in 350 women. Breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding women were compared at six weeks, six and twelve months postpartum. We compared the groups regarding demographic and obstetric data, neonatal outcome, disease characteristics, medical treatment and self-reported data on pain, fatigue and disease burden. Information on breastfeeding was registered at least once during the follow-up postpartum. Disease activity was measured by Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index-CRP (ASDAS-CRP) and Bath Ankylosing Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
resultsThe proportion of patients breastfeeding at the postpartum follow ups was 86% (347 women) at six weeks, 70% (221 women) at six months, and 38% (104 women) at twelve months, respectively. A larger proportion of the non-breastfeeding group had delivered with caesarean section (C-section), 24 of 59 (41%) non-breastfeeding vs 70 of 347 (20%) breastfeeding women. ASDAS-CRP was higher for the non-breastfeeding group at six weeks (2.6 vs 2.2) and at six months (2.6 vs 2.1), and BASDAI was higher for the same group at six months (4.1 vs 3.2). CRP (mg/L) was significantly higher among the non-breastfeeding at six months (5.3 vs 3.3). VAS pain scores were higher for the non-breastfeeding group at six weeks (41.0 vs 31.6) and six months (43.9 vs 31.0). VAS fatigue was higher for the same group at six months (46.8 vs 37.8).
conclusionOur results suggest that particular attention should be given regarding breastfeeding to women with active inflammatory disease and those who have undergone C-section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.