ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Examining kidney donation in Nigeria: a mixed methods study of family members' knowledge, perceptions, information needs and decision-making.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA major challenge of transplantation is the unavailability of organs. For a successful transplantation process, awareness and negative attitudes among potential donors need to be sought for and addressed. Our objective was to examine the knowledge, perception and information needs of family members of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Nigeria and factors associated with their likelihood to decide to donate a kidney.
methodsThis was a convergent parallel mixed method study that obtained information from family members of patients with CKD in Nigeria. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with the likelihood of donation. Thematic analysis was used for the qualitative analysis.
resultsThree hundred and six respondents with a mean age of 41.2 ± 12.9 years participated in the quantitative survey. About 30% of participants were not familiar with the concept of kidney donation; 63% had never sought information about kidney donation; about 75% felt inadequately informed about the risks, benefits, and requirements of kidney donation. About 26% of participants were unlikely to consider donating a kidney to a family member with CKD. The majority expressed medical risk (47%) as their primary concern with donation. The age group of respondents (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.239-0.967, P = 0.04), parent/child relationship, (OR 2.42, 95%CI 1.198-4.886, P = 0.01), awareness of the suitable medical factors for donation (OR 2.07, 95%CI 1.127-3.796, P = 0.02), and provision of support or counsel to donors (OR 3.89, 95%CI 1.576-9.638, P = 0.003), were independently associated with decisions to donate. The qualitative analysis identified personal, socio-cultural, religious and psychological factors that could influence willingness to donate.
conclusionThis study identified factors that influenced donations and brought to the fore the need to adequately educate and provide support for potential kidney donors. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.