ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025
Early pregnancy loss rate in first-time fresh cycles of low prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria: a single-center data analysis.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsThe study was designed to analyze early pregnancy loss rates in first-time fresh embryo transfer cycles in low prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study, including patients with positive human chorionic gonadotropin after first fresh cycles in the Reproductive Center of Henan Province People's Hospital from June 2018 to February 2023. A total of 2392 cycles were included in this study, which were divided into 4 groups according to the POSEIDON criteria. The general condition, laboratory indexes, and early pregnancy loss rates of patients were compared in each group and the prediction model was constructed in POSEIDON group 4.
resultsThe early pregnancy loss rate ranked from high to low in order of Group D (32.82%), Group B (23.31%), Group C (15.34%), and Group A (13.68%). After adjusting confounding factors, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the early pregnancy loss rate was significantly higher in groups B and D than in groups A and C (all P < 0.05). The comparison between Group A and Group C, as well as between Group B and Group D, showed no statistical differences (both P > 0.05). Group D was randomly divided into training and validation cohorts according to 7:3. The prediction model was constructed based on risk factors. The AUC of the training cohort was 0.761(95% CI: 0.680-0.841), and the AUC of the validation cohort was 0.604(95% CI: 0.440-0.767).
conclusionsPatients in POSEIDON group 4 have the highest early pregnancy loss rate, followed by group 2, while patients in groups 3 and 1 have the lowest rate in first-time fresh cycles. The prediction model was successfully established which can predict the occurrence of early pregnancy loss in first-time fresh cycles in POSEIDON group 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.