ArticleBMC oral health2025
Three-dimensional volume changes of the palatal vault and pharyngeal airway following facemask therapy and maxillary expansion: a prospective comparative study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cephalometric Sagittal Changes Suggestive of Maxillary Anterior Displacement and Mandibular Immediate Shift Following 3D-Guided Midpalatal Piezocorticotomy-Assisted MARPE in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive variables analysis for the tongue crib treatment of anterior crossbite in mixed dentition.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated three-dimensional volumetric changes in the palatal vault and pharyngeal airway following facemask therapy (FM) with or without slow maxillary expansion (SME) in late mixed and early permanent dentition. Additionally, it compared dimensional changes in the palatal vault, including its length, height, and width. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe sample included 26 patients (16 females, 10 males), aged 10 to 14 years (mean age: 11.88 ± 1.18 years) with Class III malocclusion who had completed facemask therapy, either with or without slow maxillary expansion. Patients were divided into two groups: FM/SME (n = 13) and FM (n = 13). The palatal vault was subdivided into anterior and posterior sections, and the upper airway was divided into the nasopharynx, velopharynx, and glossopharynx. Changes were assessed using CBCT before (T0) and after (T1) treatment with standardized methods. Statistical analysis included the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group comparisons, and independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney tests for between-group comparisons.
resultsBoth groups exhibited significant increases in total palatal vault volume and posterior palatal vault volume. Nasopharyngeal volume also increased significantly in both groups from T0 to T1, while no significant changes were observed in the lower pharynx (velopharynx and glossopharynx).
conclusionBoth treatment groups demonstrated distinct effects on the palatal vault and nasopharyngeal volume. The FM/SME group yielded a greater increase in the palatal vault volume (16%) compared to the FM group (11.4%); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Combining FM with SME did not yield significant additional effect on the pharyngeal airway volume compared to FM alone, suggesting limited clinical advantage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.