ArticleBMC oral health2025
Comparing diagnostic skills in endodontic cases: dental students versus ChatGPT-4o.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in endodontic education: a systematic review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of artificial intelligence-assisted personalized feedback on radiographic diagnostic performance of dental students: a controlled study.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots and Dental Students on Context of Dental Trauma.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of large language models in the classification of superior labial frenulum attachments.Odontology · 2026Article
- Accuracy, Self-Reported Confidence, and Overconfidence of Large Language Models in Endodontics: An Evaluation Using National Specialty Examination Questions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT and teledentistry compared with dentist examination in detecting dental caries: preliminary diagnostic accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Performance Comparison of a Domain-Specific Chatbot and General-Purpose Chatbots in Dental Traumatology.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Endodontic Symptom Assessment and Treatment Planning Using Image-Free Clinical Records: Comparative Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Can chatbots replace experts? Diagnostic accuracy of AI models in classifying impacted mandibular third molars.Odontology · 2026Article
- Large language models and generative artificial intelligence in endodontics: a scoping review.Odontology · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Ability of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence to Identify Endodontic Instruments: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 3 Flash.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of various artificial intelligence applications' performance in responding to multiple-choice endodontics questions.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- AI-based diagnostic evaluation of GPT-4o for crown-fracture detection on maxillary periapical radiographs: effects of prompt detail and customization.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluating large language models for endodontic case difficulty assessment: accuracy, consistency, temporal stability, and agreement.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluating AI Chatbots in Prosthodontics Education: A Quantitative MCQ-Based Assessment.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy and repeatability of ChatGPT using textual and radiographic data in reversible pulpitis: a retrospective diagnostic study.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Endodontic Education: A Systematic Review with Frequentist and Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Student-Based Evidence.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) technologies have revolutionized fields such as economics, law, and healthcare. Large language models, like ChatGPT, have shown significant potential in dentistry, supporting diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and education. However, earlier versions of ChatGPT were limited to text-based data. The latest multimodal model, ChatGPT-4o, introduced in 2024, now processes text, images, audio, and video, enabling broader applications in clinical education. This study evaluates ChatGPT-4o's diagnostic accuracy in endodontic cases, comparing it with dental students' performance. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included two groups of dental students: 3rd-year and 5th-year, alongside ChatGPT-4o. Participants answered 15 multiple-choice questions designed using radiographs, clinical photographs, and patient histories. These questions, based on the American Association of Endodontists' Clinical Guidelines, were administered via Google Forms for students and ChatGPT-4o. Responses were categorized as correct, incorrect, or unanswered. Data were analyzed statistically.
resultsChatGPT-4o demonstrated a higher accuracy rate and lower error rate compared to students, with 91.4% correct and 8.2% incorrect responses. Third-year students had a correct response rate of 60.8%, while fifth-year students achieved 79.5%. A statistically significant difference was found between the study groups in terms of correct response rates (p < 0.05), with ChatGPT outperforming both student groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, fifth-year students showed a higher correct response rate compared to third-year students.
conclusionChatGPT-4o demonstrates significant potential as a diagnostic support tool in dental education, particularly in endodontics. Its high diagnostic accuracy and consistency highlight its value as an innovative ( application in clinical training and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.