Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40158106›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Worldwide trends in the quality and breadth of clinical investigations of medical devices over the past decade: a scoping review and evidence map.

David F Keane, Cherian Mathew, Ryan Longley, Rosie Dunne, Thomas Mathew, Elaine Harris, Paddy Gillespie, Abhay Pandit, Matthew D Griffin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David F KeaneCÚRAM Research Ireland Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland. keanedd@universityofgalway.ie.
Cherian MathewSaolta University Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland.
Ryan LongleyCardiac Physiology, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Rosie DunneUniversity of Galway Library, Galway, Ireland.
Thomas MathewUniversity of Limerick Hospital Group, Limerick, Ireland.
Elaine HarrisCÚRAM Research Ireland Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Paddy GillespieCÚRAM Research Ireland Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Abhay PanditCÚRAM Research Ireland Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Matthew D GriffinCÚRAM Research Ireland Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent regulatory developments in Europe have enhanced the requirements for clinical investigations of medical devices, partly in response to a perceived need for a higher level of evidence that is publicly available. This scoping review aims to map published clinical investigations of medical devices by device type and clinical specialty and summarise key trial design aspects.

methodsWe developed a search for EMBASE that identified clinical investigations of medical devices during two discrete 3-month periods at the end of 2012 and of 2022. Core information from observational studies was extracted along with details on study design in interventional studies. We developed an evidence map of published studies across device type and clinical specialty and summarised study design aspects.

resultsWe included 682 studies from 2012 and 1682 studies from 2022. Around a quarter of studies were interventional and the remainder being observational and primary outcomes of effectiveness were more common than efficacy. Key study design aspects were frequently unreported, including sample size justification, registration, randomisation technique and funders. Our evidence map demonstrated that predominantly, investigations were of implants and were in a cardiovascular setting. Clinical investigations were broadly similar between 2012 and 2022, though there was a reduction in the proportion of cardiovascular studies, a move in the share of studies coming out of Europe and North America towards Asia and a general improvement in the quality of study design reported.

conclusionsImplanted devices in cardiovascular disease and orthopaedics are the focus of a large proportion of published clinical investigations of medical devices. Reporting of key study design aspects of clinical investigations of medical devices are improving but are still below expected requirements. REGISTRATION: A pre-specified and published protocol was registered on figshare: doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22276945.v1 on 15/03/2023.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEquipment and SuppliesResearch DesignEvidence-Based MedicineHumansTime FactorsClinical trialEvidence mapMedical deviceScoping review

Identifiers

PMID40158106
PMCPMC11955138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.