Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40158097›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2025

N6-methyladenine identification using deep learning and discriminative feature integration.

Salman Khan, Islam Uddin, Sumaiya Noor, Salman A AlQahtani, Nijad Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Salman KhanDepartment of Computer Science, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Islam UddinDepartment of Computer Science, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Sumaiya NoorBusiness and Management Sciences Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Salman A AlQahtaniDepartment of Computer Engineering, New Emerging Technologies and 5g Network and Beyond Research Chair, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nijad AhmadDepartment of Computer Science, Khurasan University, Jalalabad, Afghanistan. Nijad@khurasan.edu.af.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N6-methyladenine (6 mA) is a pivotal DNA modification that plays a crucial role in epigenetic regulation, gene expression, and various biological processes. With advancements in sequencing technologies and computational biology, there is an increasing focus on developing accurate methods for 6 mA site identification to enhance early detection and understand its biological significance. Despite the rapid progress of machine learning in bioinformatics, accurately detecting 6 mA sites remains a challenge due to the limited generalizability and efficiency of existing approaches. In this study, we present Deep-N6mA, a novel Deep Neural Network (DNN) model incorporating optimal hybrid features for precise 6 mA site identification. The proposed framework captures complex patterns from DNA sequences through a comprehensive feature extraction process, leveraging k-mer, Dinucleotide-based Cross Covariance (DCC), Trinucleotide-based Auto Covariance (TAC), Pseudo Single Nucleotide Composition (PseSNC), Pseudo Dinucleotide Composition (PseDNC), and Pseudo Trinucleotide Composition (PseTNC). To optimize computational efficiency and eliminate irrelevant or noisy features, an unsupervised Principal Component Analysis (PCA) algorithm is employed, ensuring the selection of the most informative features. A multilayer DNN serves as the classification algorithm to identify N6-methyladenine sites accurately. The robustness and generalizability of Deep-N6mA were rigorously validated using fivefold cross-validation on two benchmark datasets. Experimental results reveal that Deep-N6mA achieves an average accuracy of 97.70% on the F. vesca dataset and 95.75% on the R. chinensis dataset, outperforming existing methods by 4.12% and 4.55%, respectively. These findings underscore the effectiveness of Deep-N6mA as a reliable tool for early 6 mA site detection, contributing to epigenetic research and advancing the field of computational biology.

Indexed as

AdenineComputational BiologyDeep LearningAlgorithmsDNA MethylationHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPrincipal Component AnalysisAdenineDeep LearningDeep Neural NetworkDNA Methylation DetectionDNA ModificationsEpigeneticsN6-methyladenine (6 mA)Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID40158097
PMCPMC11955129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.