ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Cross-sectional assessment of the Tinetti performance-oriented mobility tool for screening physical frailty syndrome in older adults.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Qualitative assessment of mobility in older adults: a scoping review of process-oriented behavioural criteria.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026Review
- The Relation Between Quality of Life, Functional Impairment and Nutritional Status in Older People.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical-functional fitness (PFF) assessments have become crucial tools for identifying physical frailty syndrome (PFS) in older adults, helping guide preventive and interventional strategies. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of performance-based PFF tests for detecting PFS among community-dwelling older adults in Tehran, Iran. Additionally, it sought to compare PFF variables between PFS groups to assess the applicability of these tests as practical screening tools in clinical and community settings.
methodsData were collected from 161 participants (91 males, 56.5%; 70 females, 43.5%), including sociodemographic, anthropometric, medical history, PFF, and PFS assessments.
resultsFrail participants exhibited significantly lower scores in various PFF tests, including the Tinetti balance, walking, and total score components, physical activity levels (PAL), mean hand grip strength (MGS), 30-s arm curl (30 s-AC), 30 s-chair stand (30 s-CS), Standing Stork Balance (SSB), and back stretch (BST) tests (p < 0.001). Frail individuals also had lower levels of education, shorter stature, and higher BMI compared to non-frail/pre-frail participants, highlighting broader vulnerabilities. Logistic regression analyses showed that all PFF tests, including Tinetti balance and walking components, MGS, 30 s-AC, 30 s-CS, were significant protective factors against FS. However, ROC curve analysis revealed optimal cutoff points for PFS identification, with PAL and MGS demonstrating the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting PFS. The all components of Tinetti scale also proved to be strong predictors of FS.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that, regardless of age, sex, education level, stature, and fall incidence, PFF assessments remain critical for identifying older adults at risk for PFS. The study highlights the predictive strength of key variables, such as PAL, MGS, and the Tinetti-POMA components, offering novel insights into the role of these tests in improving PFS screening accuracy. These results underscore the importance of integrating PFF assessments into routine clinical and community-based health evaluations, enabling early detection and timely interventions to promote healthier aging trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.