ArticleScientific reports2025
Noninvasive estimation of internal spinal alignment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using PCdare and back shape asymmetry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Static Plantar-Load Distribution and Stabilometry in Children and Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis Under Different Testing Conditions: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Radiation-free Cobb angle estimation in adolescent scoliosis using surface topography and a linear regression model.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- PCdare software registers 3D back surface with biplanar radiographs: application to patients with scoliosis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical 3D surface scanning is used increasingly to assess spinal deformity in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), largely because it avoids additional radiation burden. However, such approaches generally underestimate the extent of the abnormality. Improving the accuracy of such estimates requires a deeper understanding of AIS and its effect on back shape. We present a unique platform with publicly available code that contains noninvasive and nonionizing approaches to estimating the Cobb angle of the primary curve, called primary Cobb angle (pCA) and internal spinal alignment (ISL) in patients with AIS. Our approaches use asymmetries of the back shape during upright standing, the Adam's forward bending test, bending forward, and lateral bending. The results have revealed strong (0.75 [0.53, 0.87]) to excellent (0.91 [0.81, 0.96]) correlations [95% confidence interval] and a median pairwise absolute error (IQR) of 3.4° (6.8°) between the estimated pCAs and clinical gold-standard assessments in 30 patients. The correlations (IQR) between estimated shape of ISLs and their references were very strong (0.87 (0.24)) to excellent (0.94 (0.03)), and the median root mean square error (IQR) between estimated and reference ISL was 6.9 mm (3.3 mm). These results indicate confidence both in the use of 3D scanning using a "back-shape-to-spine" approach and in the establishment of optical 3D surface scanning approaches for scoliosis screening and monitoring in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.