ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with lower extremity melanoma: based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower extremity melanoma (LEM) is a relatively common malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. This study aims to identify prognostic factors and develop a nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with LEM. A total of 4257 LEM patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided into a training set (2979 cases) and a validation set (1278 cases). In the training set, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors associated with patient outcomes, and a nomogram model was constructed. The model's validity was then assessed by generating ROC curves, C-index, clinical decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves, and validated using the validation set. Multivariate Cox regression analysis in the training set revealed that age, gender, AJCC stage, AJCC.M, Breslow thickness, radiotherapy, mitotic rate, ulceration, first malignant primary indicator, and marital status were independent variables associated with OS. In both the training and validation sets, the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS was 0.887, 0.868, and 0.859, and 0.859, 0.872, and 0.848, respectively. The C-index, calibration curves, and DCA demonstrated good agreement in both the training and validation sets. In this study, we developed and validated a nomogram to predict OS in patients with LEM, demonstrating good reliability and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40158034What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.