Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40157999›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Growth variability of farm grown teak in response to climatic and soil factors across three agroclimatic zones of Tamil Nadu, India.

R Ashick Rajah, S Radhakrishnan, A Balasubramanian, J Balamurugan, R Ravi, M Sivaprakash, B Sivakumar, C N Hariprasath, G Swathiga, S Navaneetha Krishnan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

R Ashick RajahForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India. ashickrajni@gmail.com.
S RadhakrishnanForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India. drsradhakrishnan@gmail.com.
A BalasubramanianForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India. balafcri@gmail.com.
J BalamuruganForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
R RaviForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
M SivaprakashForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
B SivakumarForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
C N HariprasathForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
G SwathigaForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
S Navaneetha KrishnanForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
Ghazanfer AbbasForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
V VasanthForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
Nilav Ranjan BoraForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.
Pragati B PatilForest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, 641 301, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teak (Tectona grandis, Linn. f) is a prized hardwood species with remarkable properties that make it a favored material in various industries. In current trend, the cultivation of teak in farmlands is considered as a promising option. But the documentation and research on growth attributes and the studies on influence of climatic and edaphic factors on growth of teak raised in farmland condition is lacking. In this regard, the present investigation on farm grown teak was perpetrated in three agroclimatic zones viz., High Rainfall Zone, Southern Zone and Cauvery Delta Zone of Tamil Nadu in four different age classes (0-5, 5-10, 10-15 and 15-20 years). The study was carried forward with the prime motive of determining growth attributes and analyzing the impact of climatic and edaphic parameters on growth biometry of farm raised teak, both in block and boundary plantations. The soil physico-chemical parameters were analyzed both in surface (0-15 cm) and subsurface (15-30 cm) of plantations and the outcomes were presented in the form of cluster heat map, the results revealed that maximum organic carbon (0.62%), available nitrogen (197 kg ha

Indexed as

ClimateSoilAgricultureAnimalsFarmsIndiaNitrogenNitrogenSoilClimaticCluster heat mapCorrelationEdaphicPrincipal component analysisTeak

Identifiers

PMID40157999
PMCPMC11954884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.