ArticleScientific reports2025
Simulator training for enhanced interventional radiology education.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of Interventional Radiology Curricula for Medical Students and Correlation with Kern's Six-Step Framework for Curriculum Development.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- Simulation and Virtual Reality as Training Modalities in Interventional Radiology: A Systematic Review.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenges of staff shortages and the need to gain practical experience in interventional radiology by increasing attention in the medical curriculum, especially in combination with the opportunity to successfully gain hands-on experience, can help influence medical students' career decisions in favor of IR. Regular training on VR simulators can reduce the amount of X-ray radiation needed to adequately care for patients. Ten medical students underwent five angiographic training sessions using an endovascular simulator. Virtual fluoroscopy time was recorded during each session to measure skill development. Pre- and post-training questionnaires were conducted to assess changes in subjective proficiency and career interests. The median virtual fluoroscopy time decreased from 19.3 min initially to 9.3 min (p = 0.007), indicating enhanced procedural proficiency. Post-training questionnaires revealed a notable increase in interest in interventional radiology among participants. Additionally, participants reported improvements in practical skills, understanding of interventional radiology, and readiness for real-world interventions. Simulator-based training significantly enhances procedural proficiency and could impact career interests in interventional radiology. Despite the small sample size, the findings support the efficacy of VR training in medical education, highlighting the need for further research to optimize the implementation of simulation technology in medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.