Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40157996›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Simulator training for enhanced interventional radiology education.

Nina Kronner, Markus Strebl, Julian Lenk, Bernhard Gebauer, Oliver Schweizerhof, Anne Frisch, Charlotte Wintergerst, Wibke Uller, Maximilian de Bucourt, Elif Can

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nina KronnerDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. nina.kronner@charite.de.
Markus StreblDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Julian LenkDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Bernhard GebauerCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Oliver SchweizerhofInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Anne FrischCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Charlotte WintergerstDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Wibke UllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Maximilian de BucourtDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Elif CanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the challenges of staff shortages and the need to gain practical experience in interventional radiology by increasing attention in the medical curriculum, especially in combination with the opportunity to successfully gain hands-on experience, can help influence medical students' career decisions in favor of IR. Regular training on VR simulators can reduce the amount of X-ray radiation needed to adequately care for patients. Ten medical students underwent five angiographic training sessions using an endovascular simulator. Virtual fluoroscopy time was recorded during each session to measure skill development. Pre- and post-training questionnaires were conducted to assess changes in subjective proficiency and career interests. The median virtual fluoroscopy time decreased from 19.3 min initially to 9.3 min (p = 0.007), indicating enhanced procedural proficiency. Post-training questionnaires revealed a notable increase in interest in interventional radiology among participants. Additionally, participants reported improvements in practical skills, understanding of interventional radiology, and readiness for real-world interventions. Simulator-based training significantly enhances procedural proficiency and could impact career interests in interventional radiology. Despite the small sample size, the findings support the efficacy of VR training in medical education, highlighting the need for further research to optimize the implementation of simulation technology in medical training.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalRadiology, InterventionalSimulation TrainingAdultClinical CompetenceCurriculumFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesInterventional radiologyMedical educationMedical training outcomesSimulator trainingVirtual reality (VR)VR-enhanced simulation

Identifiers

PMID40157996
PMCPMC11954981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.