Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40157984›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2025

Advancing archaeal research through FAIR resource and data sharing, and inclusive community building.

Solenne Ithurbide, Nicole Buan, Stefan Schulze

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Solenne IthurbideDépartement de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1533-8472
Nicole BuanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-973X
Stefan SchulzeGosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA. stefan.schulze@rit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-7987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last two decades archaeal research has expanded into a wide-ranging research field, driven by a fairly small research community. Archaea are now recognized as important players in the One-Health approach and expertise on the biology of archaea has become crucial in the study of a broad range of topics and environments, including the host-associated microbiomes, major nutrient cycles, greenhouse gas metabolism, the cell biology and origin of eukaryotes, adaptation of life to extremes, as well as various biotechnological applications. Here, we summarize existing resources and ongoing efforts in the engaged broader archaeal scientific community to accelerate research and resource sharing guided by FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) data-sharing principles. We highlight ongoing community efforts that: (i) aim to share protocols and best practices for working with archaea (e.g. ARCHAEA.bio), (ii) combine large 'omics datasets for the dissemination of unified, system-wide results (e.g. Archaeal Proteome Project, KBase) and (iii) provide opportunities for scientists to present their work in a supportive environment and to forge connections and collaborations (e.g. Archaea Power Hour). Together, these resources and projects promise to spur and cross-fertilize research, making archaeal research more accessible to a broader and more diverse audience.

Indexed as

ArchaeaInformation Dissemination

Identifiers

PMID40157984
PMCPMC11954925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.