Observational studyScientific reports2025
Diagnostic features of Acanthamoeba keratitis via in vivo confocal microscopy.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acanthamoeba Keratitis: 34-Year Epidemiological Profile.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- PortableBiomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Mooren's ulcer: a multifactorial autoimmune peripheral ulcerative keratitis and current treatment protocols.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches for Automated Fungal Keratitis Diagnosis Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) offers a non-invasive, rapid method for diagnosing Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) by detecting cysts or trophozoites in the initial clinic visit images. In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed HRT3 IVCM images from patients presenting to Manchester Royal Eye Hospital with clinically- suspected AK for IVCM morphological features (IVCM-MF) of both Acanthamoeba and corneal cells. Twenty-seven patients were included in the study: median age 29 years (range 16-71 years), female gender (59%; n = 16/27) and contact lens wear as the main risk factor. Median symptom duration before the initial ophthalmologist visit was 9 days (range 2 to 42 days). IVCM had a higher detection rate for AK in 85% of patients (n = 23/27), with culture positivity in only 74% (n = 20/27; 17 of whom were also IVCM-positive). Acanthamoeba IVCM-MF included: bright spots (87%, n = 20/23), double-walled cysts (56%, n = 13/23), signet-ring (22%, n = 5/23) and trophozoites (30%, n = 7/23). Bright spots and double-walled cysts coalesced in lines/clusters in 1 patient. Corneal epithelial cells had a "koilocyte" appearance in 64% (n = 14/22). Microtubules connecting adjacent keratocytes were visible in 52% (n = 12/23), particularly associated with A. polyphaga ulcers (p = 0.02). These IVCM features observed in corneal epithelial cells and keratocytes may represent potential imaging biomarkers for AK diagnosis and warrant further investigation to validate their diagnostic utility. By demonstrating IVCM's superior diagnostic performance, providing rapid and accurate diagnostics, this study advocates for its inclusion in standard diagnostic workflows for AK, paving the way for future advancements in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.