ArticleScientific reports2025
High blood pressure inhibits cardiovascular responsiveness to expressive classical music.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Haptic Meditation Enhancement Device (HMED): An Arduino-Based Multi-Sensor Real-Time Monitoring and Intervention Support System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Listeners' baseline autonomic states associated with distinct music-physiology response patterns.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Music lowers hypertensive patients' blood pressure (BP) in the long-term, but the dynamics of BP during music-listening are not well understood. This study aims to determine: (1) whether individuals with high and normal BP respond to music differently; and, (2) whether music's loudness or tempo drives these differences. Music with computer-altered tempo and loudness is rendered on a reproducing piano to 40 middle-aged participants, 20 with baseline BP above 140/90 mmHg (H-bBP) and 20 below (N-bBP) but above 90/60 mmHg, paired by playlist. Continuous BP was recorded whilst they listened to playlists of 9 tempo- and loudness-transposed versions of 8 distinct pieces of Western classical music (40 min) after a 5-minute baseline silence. Both participant groups' mean systolic and diastolic BP rose significantly higher than baseline during music listening, with normotensives' mean systolic and diastolic BP rising significantly more than hypertensives'. Both groups' BP variability (indexed by range and standard deviation of continuous BP measurements) reduced during faster tempi, but not during increased loudness. BP variability is significantly higher for both groups during the slowest pieces, which maintain the originally performed tempi. These findings suggest that music's long-term benefit, like exercise, may come from its power to temporarily physiologically activate listeners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.