ArticleScientific reports2025
Network pharmacology and AI in cancer research uncovering biomarkers and therapeutic targets for RALGDS mutations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Transcriptomics, Machine Learning, and Molecular Dynamics Reveal Honghua Longdan (ACS omega · 2026Article
- Integrated In Silico and Experimental Validation of Antrocin as a Plant-Derived Multi-Target Therapeutic for BRAF/MEK/PI3K-Driven Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Epidemic Dynamics and Intervention Measures in Campus Settings Based on Multilayer Temporal Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of target therapies is accountable for the higher mortality of various types of cancer. To address this issue, we selected a target mutated Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene homologue, which plays a significant role in various cancers. Our study aims to identify selective biomarkers and develop diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for KRAS-associated genes using artificial intelligence. Initially, Genomic data, cancer epidemiology, proteomics network interactions, and omics enrichment were analyzed. Structured E-pharmacophore model aided in capturing the binding cavity using eraser algorithms and fabricating a new selective lead compound for the KRSA. The selective molecule was abridged inside the binding cavity and stability was validated through 100 ns molecular dynamics simulations. Epidemiological-neural network studies indicated KRAS mutations leads 40 types of cancer, exclusively pancreatic and colorectal cancers, with diploid and missense mutations as primary factors. Pathway analysis highlighted the involvement of the MAPK and RAS signaling pathways in cancer development and proteomics analysis identified RALGDS as a key protein. Protein-based pharmacophore analysis mapped the biologically active features such as donor, acceptor and aromatic ring with the designed ligands. The results of interaction interpretation illustrate that the amino acid Tyr566 formed an H-bond interaction with the amine group of the octyl ring system and 20 amino acids crafted to properly orient the molecule to fit inside the polar cavity of KRAS protein. The MMGBSA score of - 53.33 kcal/mol conformed to the well-configured binding with KRSA and realistic model simulation exposed the π-π, π-cationic and hydrophobic interactions stabilised the molecule inside the KRSA protein throughout 100 ns simulation. The study demonstrates the vitality of AI and network pharmacology to identify potential-target biomarkers for KRAS-associated genes, paving the way for improved cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.