Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40157933›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2025

Assessing the success of marine ecosystem restoration using meta-analysis.

R Danovaro, J Aronson, S Bianchelli, C Boström, W Chen, R Cimino, C Corinaldesi, J Cortina-Segarra, P D'Ambrosio, C Gambi and 14 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Restoration transforms coastal wetland ecosystem services over time.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

R DanovaroDept. of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy. r.danovaro@univpm.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9025-9395
J AronsonCenter for Conservation and Sustainable Development, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO., USA.
S BianchelliDept. of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1957-3269
C BoströmEnvironmental and Marine Biology, Åbo Akademi University, Åbo Turku, Finland.
W ChenNorwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Oslo, Norway.
R CiminoNational Cluster Blue Italian Growth, Naples, Italy.
C CorinaldesiDepartment of Science and Engineering of Matter, Environment and Urban Planning (SIMAU), Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-541X
J Cortina-SegarraDepartment of Ecology - IMEM, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
P D'AmbrosioStazione Zoologica "Anton Dohrn", National Institute of Marine Biology Ecology and Biotechnology, Naples, Italy.
C GambiDept. of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
J GarrabouInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
A GiorgettiDept. of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
A GrehanEarth and Ocean Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7893-4717
A HannachiLaboratory of Environment Biomonitoring, Coastal Ecology and Ecotoxicology Unit, University of Carthage, Zarzouna, Tunisia.
L MangialajoUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, UMR 7035 ECOSEAS, Nice, France.
T MoratoInstitute of Marine Sciences - OKEANOS, University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2393-4773
S OrfanidisFisheries Research Institute (ELGO DIMITRA), Kavala, Greece.
N PapadopoulouInstitute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
E Ramirez-LlodraREV Ocean, Lysaker, Norway.
C J SmithInstitute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
P SnelgroveDepartments of Ocean Sciences and Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6725-0472
J van de KoppelDepartment of Estuarine and Delta Systems, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-4275
J van TatenhoveEnvironmental Policy Group, Delta Climate Center, Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1969-3594
S FraschettiNational Biodiversity Future Centre, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1780-1651

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101135492Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (Ministry of Education, University and Research) CN_00000033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine ecosystem restoration success stories are needed to incentivize society and private enterprises to build capacity and stimulate investments. Yet, we still must demonstrate that restoration efforts can effectively contribute to achieving the targets set by the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis on 764 active restoration interventions across a wide range of marine habitats worldwide. We show that marine ecosystem restorations have an average success of ~64% and that they are: viable for a large variety of marine habitats, including deep-sea ecosystems; highly successful for saltmarshes, tropical coral reefs and habitat-forming species such as animal forests; successful at all spatial scales, so that restoration over large spatial scales can be done using multiple interventions at small-spatial scales that better represent the natural variability, and scalable through dedicated policies, regulations, and financing instruments. Restoration interventions were surprisingly effective even in areas where human impacts persisted, demonstrating that successful restorations can be initiated before all stressors have been removed. These results demonstrate the immediate feasibility of a global 'blue restoration' plan even for deep-sea ecosystems, enabled by increasing availability of new and cost-effective technologies.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationAnimalsCoral ReefsHumansOceans and Seas

Identifiers

PMID40157933
PMCPMC11954923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.