Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40157932›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

SEPDNet: simple and effective PCB surface defect detection method.

Du Lang, Zhenzhen Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Du LangSchool of Information and Design, Zhejiang Industry Polytechnic College, Shaoxing, 312000, China. 20230037@zjipc.edu.cn.
Zhenzhen LvFaculty of Robot Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110167, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replacing time-consuming and costly manual inspections on production lines with efficient and accurate defect detection algorithms for Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) remains a significant challenge. Current PCB defect detection methods are typically optimized using existing models such as YOLO and Faster R-CNN to enhance detection accuracy. In this study, we analyse a PCB defect dataset characterized by small targets and a concentrated size distribution. SEPDNet (Simple and Effective PCB Defect Detection Network) is designed for the characteristics of the dataset, only one detection head is used, which reduces the number of parameters and improves the detection performance at the same time. SEPDNet uses RepConv (Re-parameterizable Convolution) to improve the backbone representation ability, and FPN (Feature Pyramid Network) is used in the neck part to simplify the model. SEPDNet has fewer than 30% of the parameters of YOLOv9u-s, yet achieves an improvement of 0.025 in the F1 score, 2.7% in mAP50, and 3.8% in mAP50:95 compared to YOLOv9u-s. We propose the method of designing the model according to the characteristics of the dataset. Our experiments show that customizing the model design according to dataset characteristics can achieve strong performance with a simplified structure and fewer parameters.

Indexed as

Defect detectionPCB defectsPrinted Circuit BoardsSmall object detection

Identifiers

PMID40157932
PMCPMC11954906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.